Saturday 1 June 2013

Rossetti and one of his Stunners

I haven't posted a Wombat Friday post for a while, so thought I should remedy this, even though it is Saturday.  I am currently completely obsessed by The Pre-Raphaelites again (this is something that happens every so often and has done since I was about 16). This obsession manifests itself in finding images on the internet and spending on more books about the Pre-Raphaelites (Burne-Jones, Ford Madox Brown (although he wasn't really one of them, but was a huge influence) and Rossetti at the moment).  I am also fascinated by the models they used in their paintings and their lives as real women, not just immortalised in paintings and drawings. I have found that the Pre-Raphaelites are a bit like Marmite - there doesn't seem to be any middle ground - either love or hate. The paintings are so brilliantly coloured that you can't help but look at them, but I am finding as I age (mature?!), that I am preferring the preliminary drawings and studies to the finished works.
Having just finished the above book by Kirsty Stonell Walker about one of Rossetti's models, Fanny Cornforth (original name, Sarah Cox), which was fascinating, I wanted to find some images of her in drawings rather than paintings. (Kirsty's Blog is a fabulous one if you are at all interested in Victorian Art - link here)  Fanny Cornforth was unusual because she was not a sylph-like, frail Victorian woman; she was healthy and often called 'fat' - somewhat unfairly, I feel.  Her waist was not corseted down to 18 inches, or some ridiculous measurement, so for that, she was unusual.  She had a beautiful face and beautiful hair and it was this attribute which Rossetti first saw.  Apparently, he accosted her in the street, grabbing at her hair and pulling all the pins out.  Kirsty Stonell Walker says that this was like someone coming up to you in the street now and undoing your blouse - a huge and personal intrusion, verging on assault.  However, from this rather 'violent' beginning, they had a long relationship, although she was often thrown aside when another model or muse took his fancy.  His drawings of her are, I think, stunning.
 He was a master of chalk drawings.
 A delicate drawing showing a pensive expression.
 Her hair is a focus of these drawings.
 A very wistful and melancholic expression. She was also one of the only models who had earrings included in drawings or paintings.

 Another lovely chalk portrait.
 
 
The famous hair again.

In this portrait, I think I can detect a slightly suspicious expression and almost a frown, although her hair is still the main focus.

 This was one of her most famous images - that of a prostitute, in the unfinished painting 'Found'.

Here is a photograph of her, echoing the pose from the portrait above and wearing the same earrings.  Not a terribly enlightening photograph - it would have been interesting to have seen her face, rather than her profile.  The end of her life is a little mysterious - Kirsty Stonell Walker thinks she may have died abroad.  She came from humble beginnings, was a servant, then came to London and was probably a prostitute, before modelling for Rossetti.  She always seemed to be on the edge of society - Rossetti's friends didn't like her much and were suspicious of her.  However, she was a loyal lover and friend of Rossetti, and I have a great deal of respect for her.
Images from various sources including: Birmingham Museums and Art Galleries, National Portrait Gallery, Tate Britain. 
Addition:
 Here is the photograph of Fanny facing the camera mentioned in a reply (see below), but unfortunately, she still appears annoyingly unclear.  it was taken by Downey in 1863 and includes from left to right, Swinburne, Rossetti, Fanny and William Michael Rossetti.
Even with a close up, I'm not sure we are any the wiser.  Very enigmatic...

6 comments:

  1. Beautiful images Ellie. I hadnt really thought much about this subject but if only we didnt mind ladies these days being voluptuous then I wouldnt find myself having joined weightwatchers to lose a few pounds!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Anne
      Thank you. They are gorgeous drawings, aren't they? I think by today's standards, she would only have been a size 14 at the most, and probably a 12! I subscribe to the view of being comfortable in my clothes and judging my size from how tight they feel - it works for me.
      Best wishes
      Ellie

      Delete
  2. I, too,keep coming back to the Pre-Raphaelites, I think it is to do with the design and the colour. thank you for the link to Kirsty's blog, I shall enjoy that.

    I dislike all this trying to conform to a stereotype. We are what we are, height and width. Marilyn Monroe was a size 16 and gorgeous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Toffeeapple
      Thank you. Kirsty's blog is extremely enjoyable and enlightening - she has a wonderful way with words. I agree about disliking conforming to stereotypes and there is a lot of pressure, on girls particularly, to be a certain size and look a certain way. Marilyn was indeed gorgeous, although I fear that if she tried to get into modelling or films these days, she would be told to diet! Sad...
      Best wishes
      Ellie

      Delete
  3. What a fascinating post Ellie! I love the Pre-Raphaelites too but didn't know any of this. Those drawings are wonderful and yes, Fanny Cornforth was clearly something else! What an amazing story about Rossetti accosting her in the street like that! One wonders how people managed so much long hair without modern shampoos / conditioners etc - must have been a mission keeping it in good nick! I agree with you such a shame the photo doesn't show her face full on - would have been so interesting to compare with the drawings but on the other hand the fact that a photo exists at all is rather wonderful. Thank you so much for sharing this. E x

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear E
    Thank you. Apparently Rossetti accosted 'stunners' in that way on more than one occasion. I would love to have had Pre-Raphaelite hair, but I think keeping it looking like that, even these days, would be quite time consuming. As you say, I wonder how they managed in Victorian times. I think there is a photo of Fanny with Rossetti and various other people, with her looking at the camera - I'll add it above when I find it. Kirsty Stonell Walker is an authority on Fanny after spending 10 years researching the book - I think she is researching one on Alexa Wilding now.
    Best wishes
    Ellie

    ReplyDelete